Home » News » NTAG213 Vs NTAG215 Vs NTAG216:Which NFC Chip Is Right for Rating Tap Cards?

NTAG213 Vs NTAG215 Vs NTAG216:Which NFC Chip Is Right for Rating Tap Cards?

Views: 0     Author: Site Editor     Publish Time: 2026-09-16      Origin: Site

Inquire

NTAG213 vs NTAG215 vs NTAG216:Which NFC Chip is right for Rating Tap Cards?

Description:

Choosing the right NFC chip for your Google tap-to-review cards. Compare NTAG213, NTAG215 and NTAG216 to pick the best option for retail, restaurant and service businesses.

If you run a physical store, restaurant, salon or repair shop, Google reviews are one of your most powerful sources of free local traffic. More positive reviews improve your Maps ranking, build social proof and bring in more nearby customers.


NFC tap review cards (also known as nfc review cards) have become a favourite tool to lower the barrier for customers to leave feedback. Instead of asking people to open their camera and scan a QR code, shoppers simply tap their smartphone against the card, and the review page pops up instantly.

But many store owners and bulk buyers get confused: Which NFC chip works best for store review cards?

The three mainstream options are NXP NTAG213, NTAG215 and NTAG216. All belong to the same NTAG family, run at 13.56MHz and follow ISO 14443A / NFC Forum Type 2 standards. They work with iPhone (iOS13+) and Android phones without extra apps. The core difference lies in user memory, cost and flexibility.


NTAG213: Best Value for Basic NFC Review Cards

NTAG213 provides 144 bytes of user memory. This is enough space to store a standard static Google review URL like your g.page write-review link.

✅ Pros

  • Lowest unit cost, perfect for large batch orders for retail chains, supermarkets and multi-location stores

  • Small footprint, stable reading performance

  • Rewritable, so you can re-program the link if your Google business profile URL changes

  • Works reliably on PVC cards, table stands and counter stickers


❌ Cons


- Limited memory. It cannot fit long URLs with multiple UTM tracking parameters.


Best for Simple tap-to-review cards with one fixed Google review link. If you only need to send customers directly to your review page with no analytics tracking, NTAG213 is the most cost-effective pick. This is our top recommendation for most offline retailers.


NTAG215 comes with **504 bytes user memory**, over three times the usable space of NTAG213.


✅ Pros


- Supports longer URLs with UTM tracking tags. You can use different links for checkout counters, dining tables or reception desks to measure which spot generates more reviews

- Enough memory for multi-action links. For example, tap once to go to Google reviews or your business social page

- Still affordable and widely available in bulk


NTAG216: Overkill for Standard Review Collection

NTAG216 offers 888 bytes user memory, the largest in this series.


- Huge storage for complex NDEF records, multiple URLs and extra text information

Chip User Memory Ideal Use Case Cost
NTAG213 144 bytes Single static review link Low
NTAG215 504 bytes Multi-link cards Medium
NTAG216 888 bytes Complex multi-record NFC applications High


Summarize

NFC review cards reduce friction and capture reviews at the best moment — right after customers finish their purchase or service. Picking the right chip keeps your cost low while maintaining reliable tap performance. Combine the NFC card with a simple call-to-action on your counter, and you will see steady growth in authentic reviews.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter​​​​​​

Follow Us

Quick Links

Our Products

Contact Us

  olian@jhcard.com
 +86-15016941764
 2/F Building 1, Hongfa Jiateli High-Tech Park, Shiyan Street, Baoan District, Shenzhen, China
 
​Copyright ©  2024 Shenzhen Jianhe Smartcard Technology Co.,Ltd.  All Rights Reserved. Sitemap